Re: [ILUG] Getting X working on UML?

From: Ronan Waide (waider at domain waider.ie)
Date: Tue 09 Jul 2002 - 20:48:11 IST

Next message: John Gay: "Re: [ILUG] Getting X working on UML?"
Previous message: Mel: "Re: [ILUG] Getting X working on UML?"
In reply to: Mel: "Re: [ILUG] Getting X working on UML?"
Next in thread: Ronan Waide: "Re: [ILUG] Getting X working on UML?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On July 9, mel at domain csn.ul.ie said:
>
> hmmm, strange. Are you sure networking is working under UML? Can you ping
> either machine? Bear in mind that you don't set up neworking the same way
> as normal, there is a specific UML network device

My guess would be that getting "connection refused" is a good
indicator of connectivity. If the networking wasn't configured, he'd
be getting "no route to host" or similar.

Cheers,
Waider.

-- 
waider at domain waider.ie / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
"Your broker is a half-naked blue-and-orange crypto-anarchist?"
                              - Neal Stephenson / The Great Simoleon Caper

Next message: John Gay: "Re: [ILUG] Getting X working on UML?"
Previous message: Mel: "Re: [ILUG] Getting X working on UML?"
In reply to: Mel: "Re: [ILUG] Getting X working on UML?"
Next in thread: Ronan Waide: "Re: [ILUG] Getting X working on UML?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:17:47 GMT