Re: [ILUG] X on UML, the latest.

From: John Gay (johngay at domain eircom.net)
Date: Thu 11 Jul 2002 - 00:57:27 IST


On Wed 10 Jul 2002 22:27, ilug-admin at domain linux.ie wrote:
> Message: 18
> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:06:33 -0700
> To: ilug at domain linux.ie
> Subject: Re: [ILUG] X on UML, the latest.
> From: Rick Moen <rick at domain linuxmafia.com>
>
> Quoting John Gay (johngay at domain eircom.net):
> > No, I'm doing all this to see what I CAN do with UML. It seems to be a
> > cheap-mans version of using VMWare to run Linux within Linux.
> > 
> > Basically, I want to be able to run Linux within Linux so I can play
> > arould with this new Linux and thrash the hell out of it without having
> > to worry about the health of my box.
>
> Given that concern, you might want to consider avoiding xauth, because
> it's a serious security hazard.  Doing "ssh -X user at domain host" is my
> preferred substitute:  It takes care, automatically, of both the MIT
> magic cookie and the DISPLAY variable, sending all information through
> the ssh tunnel.  ("host" in that command can be localhost, for strictly
> local, non-UML usage where, e.g., you want to run an X11 client with
> root-user authority.)

Given that my box is sitting behind a SmoothWall gateway, I'm not too
concerned with security on this side. Probably because I can't be arsed to
figure out all that security stuff myself, so I put my trust in other, Open
Source security tools.

But thanks for the info. I'll probably come in handy some time.

Cheers,

        John Gay



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:17:49 GMT