Re: [ILUG] x being bloated...

From: Paul Jakma (paul at domain clubi.ie)
Date: Sun 14 Jul 2002 - 01:13:59 IST


On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, kevin lyda wrote:

> comments, someone commented that X is bloated because of it's memory
> usage.

yeah... imagine what it was like years ago when workstations with 8
or 4MB had to run it. (and i've heard rumours the earliest X
workstations had to get by on just 2MB).

let's face it, X sucks.

(what's that you say: many other pieces of software are using more
and memory, as memory has become more plentiful? sorry didnt hear
you.).

> however it's an x *server*. first, apparently x counts the video ram
> as memory it uses.

cause X sucks, obviously.

no wait, in this case it's cause the kernel counts any memory mapped
towards memory usage.

> second, clients store things on the server. so a lot of that ram
> is stuff the clients stuck on it.

well, obviously an artifact of X's suckiness.

oh hang on, if you dont like that you can turn it off with -bc (and
-su saves a bit of ram too).

> however it would be interesting to get more detailed stats from x
> about what memory is what. is there a tool to do this? some
> limited googling + some locate-ing didn't find anything.

cant find anything.

anyway, i'm off to /. to complain about how much X sucks.

> kevin

regards,

-- 
Paul Jakma	paul at domain clubi.ie	paul at domain jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Dealing with failure is easy:
	Work hard to improve.
Success is also easy to handle:
	You've solved the wrong problem.
	Work hard to improve.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:17:52 GMT