From: Ruairķ Newman (bofh at domain tech-mad.org)
Date: Tue 16 Jul 2002 - 09:49:42 IST
Based on my reading of GPL v2 and MPL v1.1, it seems to me that the only
significant difference between these two licenses is that MPL disallows
redistribution of source that has been modified to include GPL'd source.
Is anybody here sufficiently versed in both licenses to either agree
with my opinion on this or explain why I'm wrong?
-- Windows: An unrecoverable acquisition error.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:17:53 GMT