From: David Neary (dneary at domain wanadoo.fr)
Date: Mon 22 Jul 2002 - 09:32:59 IST
Ronan Waide wrote:
> Having skimmed over the patent, it appears to be describing a sort of
> image compression algorithm which gels more or less with the JPEG
> mechanism. Since I don't quite understand how jpeg works (it's hard
> math, and I'm just a dumb comp. eng.)
It's not hard math - jpeg is a straight block-based DCT with
quantisation - which is about the oldest image compression
algorithm out there, and I think certainly predates 1986. So I
really have no idea what they claim they've patented - doin DCT
on 8x8 blocks of an image, quantising the resulting coefficients,
or DCT in general? I'm extremely skeptical about this whole
story...
> I don't know how exactly it
> matches up to JPEG. I'm more curious as to whether it covers MPEG,
> because it /is/ described in the context of video streams rather than
> stills, and I had a vague impression that the MPEG and JPEG
> compression techniques were similar. One of the patents it references
> also seems to hint at MPEG.
MPEG 1, 2, 4 or 7? They're all very different compression
algorithms.
Anyway, here's to ogg, and hopefully the future mpeg4-standard
compression algorithm the project comes up with (fingers
crossed). And I wouldn't worry about the jpeg thing - in addition
the patent runs out next year, and I would suggest that having
failed to protect their IP for 15 years, as (iirc) is their
responsibility, their claim would probably never hold up in
court.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Neary,
Marseille, France
E-Mail: bolsh at domain gimp.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:18:00 GMT