RE: [ILUG] bind + lex + yacc...

From: jac1 (jac1 at domain student.cs.ucc.ie)
Date: Mon 22 Jul 2002 - 17:02:07 IST

• Next message: Dr. Mrs. Mariam Abacha: "[ILUG] Hello"
• Previous message: andrew.p.barnes at domain aib.ie: "Re: [ILUG] bind + lex + yacc..."
• Maybe in reply to: kevin lyda: "[ILUG] bind + lex + yacc..."
• Next in thread: Stephen_Reilly at domain dell.com: "RE: [ILUG] bind + lex + yacc..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> i don't really know perl and i know it's useful but i think i can
> write c faster then perl.
>
Go the way of C man! it rocks when things work and fails in a blaze of
glory when things go wrong. People will admire you for doing it in C
regardless
of whether it works or not! However the use of lex and yacc is regarded as
cheating.

• Next message: Dr. Mrs. Mariam Abacha: "[ILUG] Hello"
• Previous message: andrew.p.barnes at domain aib.ie: "Re: [ILUG] bind + lex + yacc..."
• Maybe in reply to: kevin lyda: "[ILUG] bind + lex + yacc..."
• Next in thread: Stephen_Reilly at domain dell.com: "RE: [ILUG] bind + lex + yacc..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:18:00 GMT