Re: [ILUG] web amusements...

From: Paul Jakma (paulj at domain alphyra.ie)
Date: Mon 29 Jul 2002 - 15:54:35 IST

• Next message: Philip Reynolds: "Re: [ILUG] ipfw vs ipchains vs iptables"
• Previous message: Philip Trickett: "Re: [ILUG] gnome2"
• In reply to: kevin lyda: "[ILUG] web amusements..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, kevin lyda wrote:

> RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Windows

doesnt catch some relatively popular IE builds, eg:

        Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Win32)
        Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Win32)

so if the RewriteCond thingy is a regex then perhaps:

        (Windows|Win32)

would be better?? (eg see your logs from around 10:30ish to 11ish this
morning - IE browser here in work got the non-windows stylesheet).

PS: isnt it ironic that nearly all browsers claim to be Mozilla for
compatibility reasons?

--paulj

• Next message: Philip Reynolds: "Re: [ILUG] ipfw vs ipchains vs iptables"
• Previous message: Philip Trickett: "Re: [ILUG] gnome2"
• In reply to: kevin lyda: "[ILUG] web amusements..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:18:06 GMT