From: kevin lyda (kevin+dated+1032170042.5e7df1 at domain ie.suberic.net)
Date: Wed 11 Sep 2002 - 10:54:06 IST
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:34:37AM +0100, Karl Jeacle wrote:
> What you lose on bandwidth with PPPoE is completely dwarfed by what
> you lose at the underlying ATM layer, so this is the least good
> reason not to use PPPoE. The pros/cons of PPPoE are a whole other
> discussion, and this thread is already way off-topic!
why do they (they meaning any of the adsl/cable providers) use pppoe
anyway? it's always seemed like an odd concept since ppp was created
for serial lines, not ethernet.
-- kevin at domain suberic.net that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to fork()'ed on 37058400 the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier meatspace place: home than a sober one. the happiness of credulity is a http://ie.suberic.net/~kevin cheap & dangerous quality -- g.b. shaw
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:18:48 GMT