From: Paul Jakma (paulj at domain alphyra.ie)
Date: Fri 20 Sep 2002 - 16:29:03 IST
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, kevin lyda wrote:
> eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-HD, link ok
> link partner: 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-HD
>
> and cisco says:
>
> Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is up
> Hardware is Lance, address is 00e0.b055.c4e9 (bia 00e0.b055.c4e9)
> Internet address is 62.17.162.82/28
> MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255
^^^^^^^^^^
ie that's 10MBit isnt it?
> 5304819 packets input, 966201109 bytes, 0 no buffer
> Received 71 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants
> 136 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 136 ignored, 0 abort
> 0 input packets with dribble condition detected
> 5473094 packets output, 2623946364 bytes, 0 underruns
> 342 output errors, 98 collisions, 2 interface resets
> 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 446 deferred
> 342 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
but the errors look fine.
> kevin
keep checking mii-tool on the tulip. it could be jumping backward and
forward between 10MBit-HD and 100MBit-HD because the cisco advertises
100MBit-HD.
???
regards,
-- Paul Jakma Sys Admin Alphyra paulj at domain alphyra.ie Warning: /never/ send email to spam at domain dishone.st or trap at domain dishone.st
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:18:59 GMT