Re: [ILUG] qmail, spamassasin and fetchmail

From: John Allman (allmanj at domain houseofireland.com)
Date: Wed 25 Sep 2002 - 09:32:03 IST

Next message: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] more fuel for the database fire"
Previous message: John Allman: "Re: [ILUG] qmail, spamassasin and fetchmail"
In reply to: John Allman: "Re: [ILUG] qmail, spamassasin and fetchmail"
Next in thread: John Allman: "Re: [ILUG] qmail, spamassasin and fetchmail"
Reply: John Allman: "Re: [ILUG] qmail, spamassasin and fetchmail"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John Allman wrote:

>
> mail.server.ip.address:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

Hang about, could it be the fact that RELAYCLIENT has to be defined for
spamassassin to be triggered? I'll go check this out...

Next message: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] more fuel for the database fire"
Previous message: John Allman: "Re: [ILUG] qmail, spamassasin and fetchmail"
In reply to: John Allman: "Re: [ILUG] qmail, spamassasin and fetchmail"
Next in thread: John Allman: "Re: [ILUG] qmail, spamassasin and fetchmail"
Reply: John Allman: "Re: [ILUG] qmail, spamassasin and fetchmail"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:19:02 GMT