Re: dict (was: Re: [ILUG] INODE Density and plebs.)

From: Bernard Tyers (btyers at domain snet.wit.ie)
Date: Thu 19 Aug 1999 - 10:57:40 IST

• Next message: Robert Elliott: "Re: dict (was: Re: [ILUG] INODE Density and plebs.)"
• Previous message: Bernard Tyers: "RE: [ILUG] INODE Density and plebs."
• In reply to: kevin lyda: "dict (was: Re: [ILUG] INODE Density and plebs.)"
• Next in thread: Robert Elliott: "Re: dict (was: Re: [ILUG] INODE Density and plebs.)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

So, anyone help me on the INODE question? I was told by YAST in SuSE that
when the HD had an INODE densit of over 1096 (i think) that it would make
possible problems for linux.

is that just crap, or of importance?

thanks

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
rgrds,
...bernard..

Bernard Tyers. B.Tech.Elec. Mail: btyers at domain snet.wit.ie, Web: snet.wit.ie/bbt

"A mouse is just an elephant built by the Japanese."

• Next message: Robert Elliott: "Re: dict (was: Re: [ILUG] INODE Density and plebs.)"
• Previous message: Bernard Tyers: "RE: [ILUG] INODE Density and plebs."
• In reply to: kevin lyda: "dict (was: Re: [ILUG] INODE Density and plebs.)"
• Next in thread: Robert Elliott: "Re: dict (was: Re: [ILUG] INODE Density and plebs.)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:28 GMT