RE: [ILUG] Socks == Spam

From: Breathnach, Proinnsias(Dublin) (breatpro at domain MLE.CO.UK)
Date: Tue 24 Aug 1999 - 11:10:09 IST

• Next message: Donncha O Caoimh: "Re: [ILUG] Socks == Spam"
• Previous message: Caolan McNamara: "RE: [ILUG] Socks"
• Next in thread: Donncha O Caoimh: "Re: [ILUG] Socks == Spam"
• Reply: Donncha O Caoimh: "Re: [ILUG] Socks == Spam"
• Maybe reply: Breathnach, Proinnsias(Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] Socks == Spam"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Now - unless they do Tux socks free for lugs, I'd imagine *this* counts as
Spam !

Pron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: segyetrading [SMTP:segye at domain segyetrading.co.kr]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 11:10 AM
> To: ilug at domain linux.ie
> Subject: [ILUG] Socks
>
> SEGYE YANG HAENG CO.,LTD.
>
        <BIG Snip>

• Next message: Donncha O Caoimh: "Re: [ILUG] Socks == Spam"
• Previous message: Caolan McNamara: "RE: [ILUG] Socks"
• Next in thread: Donncha O Caoimh: "Re: [ILUG] Socks == Spam"
• Reply: Donncha O Caoimh: "Re: [ILUG] Socks == Spam"
• Maybe reply: Breathnach, Proinnsias(Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] Socks == Spam"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:29 GMT