[ILUG] (no subject)

From: S.P.Vimala (vimala at domain ncb.ernet.in)
Date: Mon 30 Dec 2002 - 07:13:41 GMT

• Next message: Silent Partner: "Re: [ILUG] looking for linux software people"
• Previous message: Gavin Henrick: "Re: [ILUG] looking for linux software people"
• Next in thread: Twomey_Mark at domain emc.com: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Twomey_Mark at domain emc.com: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Paul Jakma: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Breathnach, Proinnsias(Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Patrick Dempster: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Jakma, Paul: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Ronny Bangsund: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Noel Carroll: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Breathnach, Proinnsias (Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Dunphy Richard-rdunph01: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Michael Hinds: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: colm debarra: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: colm debarra: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Barry Coughlan: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Barry Carroll: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: LI MARIUS: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Noel Carroll: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Noel Carroll: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: HAMILTON,DAVID (HP-Ireland,ex2): "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Stephen_Reilly at domain dell.com: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Baldwin_James at domain emc.com: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Burke, Gary : GIG IS&T: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Breathnach, Proinnsias (Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Michael Treacy: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Hunt, Bryan: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: James Hallam: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Hunt, Bryan: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: James Hallam: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Breathnach, Proinnsias (Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi,
            I am planning to implement webmail on linux8 with apache as my
webserver. Would horde/imp be the best option or squirrelmail if i
consider the configuration in terms of security

-vimala/.

• Next message: Silent Partner: "Re: [ILUG] looking for linux software people"
• Previous message: Gavin Henrick: "Re: [ILUG] looking for linux software people"
• Next in thread: Twomey_Mark at domain emc.com: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Twomey_Mark at domain emc.com: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Paul Jakma: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Breathnach, Proinnsias(Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Patrick Dempster: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Jakma, Paul: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Ronny Bangsund: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Noel Carroll: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Breathnach, Proinnsias (Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Dunphy Richard-rdunph01: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Michael Hinds: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: colm debarra: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: colm debarra: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Barry Coughlan: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Barry Carroll: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: LI MARIUS: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Noel Carroll: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Noel Carroll: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: HAMILTON,DAVID (HP-Ireland,ex2): "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Stephen_Reilly at domain dell.com: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Baldwin_James at domain emc.com: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Burke, Gary : GIG IS&T: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Breathnach, Proinnsias (Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Michael Treacy: "Re: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Hunt, Bryan: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: James Hallam: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Hunt, Bryan: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: James Hallam: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Breathnach, Proinnsias (Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Maybe reply: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] (no subject)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:20:44 GMT