From: John P . Looney (valen at domain tuatha.org)
Date: Wed 08 Sep 1999 - 09:25:08 IST
On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 05:03:09PM +0100, kevin lyda mentioned:
> if by "this" you mean glibc, the reason why distributions are moving to
> glibc are:
I know glibc is good. I believe it. I even like it. If a move to GNU hurd
is required, it'll make things a lot easier. However, there were also
incompatibilities between glibc 2.0 and glibc 2.1 - I mean, what's the
As for the C++ library incompatibility thing; anyone that uses C++, and
expects binary compatibility deserves what they get.
-- Microsoft. The best reason in the world to drink beer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:32 GMT