Re: [ILUG] scaling Sendmail

From: James Raftery (james at domain banba.ucd.ie)
Date: Fri 17 Sep 1999 - 14:52:19 IST

Next message: John P . Looney: "[ILUG] Re: [OT?] batch jobs query"
Previous message: Harry Moreau: "RE: [ILUG] shell script Q"
In reply to: Nick Hilliard: "Re: [ILUG] scaling Sendmail"
Next in thread: Niall Richard Murphy: "Re: [ILUG] scaling Sendmail"
Reply: Niall Richard Murphy: "Re: [ILUG] scaling Sendmail"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 02:27:09PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Nick, still vainly looking for the ultimate mailer with a properly designed
> queueing system

Could you define "properly designed"? I'm just curious what kind of
problems you see at your level of throughput.

james

-- 
James Raftery (JBR54) - Programmer Hostmaster   IE Domain Registry
Preferred Contact by Email: hostmaster at domain ucd.ie   UCD Computing Services
Web: http://www.domainregistry.ie/              Computer Centre
Tel: (+353 1) 7062375 Fax: (+353 1) 7062862     Belfield, Dublin 4, IE

Next message: John P . Looney: "[ILUG] Re: [OT?] batch jobs query"
Previous message: Harry Moreau: "RE: [ILUG] shell script Q"
In reply to: Nick Hilliard: "Re: [ILUG] scaling Sendmail"
Next in thread: Niall Richard Murphy: "Re: [ILUG] scaling Sendmail"
Reply: Niall Richard Murphy: "Re: [ILUG] scaling Sendmail"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:34 GMT