RE: [ILUG] [slightly OT] processor speed gains...

From: Jakma, Paul (Paul.Jakma at domain compaq.com)
Date: Mon 04 Oct 1999 - 12:21:42 IST


> I concur..
> Any UNIX is heavily I/O (file) intensive and hence the bottelneck
> will not be (usually) the processor speed. Get the fastest disk
> and controller you can afford.

indeed. a decent scsi controller and disk is money much better spent than
buying a 500MHz+ cpu for an IDE system. Price: well Symbios Logic cards
aren't more than a £100 and beat Adaptec's any day.. scsi disks aren't that
much more than UDMA.

i'd rather have a P2-400 + UW scsi than a P2-600 + udma.

> On that topic, has anyone tried RAID 0 on Linux?
> Padraig.

yep. works quite well with the latest RAID patches from ftp.kernel.org.
RAID5 works very well too.

Now if only LVM and RAID could be integrated => RAID5 VG's!! :)

-paul jakma.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:39 GMT