Re: [ILUG] [slightly OT] processor speed gains...

From: John P . Looney (valen at domain tuatha.org)
Date: Mon 04 Oct 1999 - 14:00:47 IST

Next message: Liam Bedford: "RE: [ILUG] [ot] letting out the magic smoke"
Previous message: John P . Looney: "Re: [ILUG] [slightly OT] processor speed gains..."
In reply to:(deleted message) David Murphy: "Re: [ILUG] [slightly OT] processor speed gains..."
Next in thread: David Murphy: "Re: [ILUG] [slightly OT] processor speed gains..."
Reply:(deleted message) David Murphy: "Re: [ILUG] [slightly OT] processor speed gains..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 12:03:33PM +0100, David Murphy mentioned:
> But first, I's suggest making sure you've plenty, of RAM, to minimise
> use of your disks - speaking for myself, I'd be thinking of 256MB as a
> sensible for a 'power user' desktop machine, more if you can afford it
> 8)

Not everyone has a grand to spend on RAM you know!

Kate

-- 
Microsoft. The best reason in the world to drink beer.
http://www.redbrick.dcu.ie/~valen

Next message: Liam Bedford: "RE: [ILUG] [ot] letting out the magic smoke"
Previous message: John P . Looney: "Re: [ILUG] [slightly OT] processor speed gains..."
In reply to:(deleted message) David Murphy: "Re: [ILUG] [slightly OT] processor speed gains..."
Next in thread: David Murphy: "Re: [ILUG] [slightly OT] processor speed gains..."
Reply:(deleted message) David Murphy: "Re: [ILUG] [slightly OT] processor speed gains..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:39 GMT