From: David Neary (nearyd at domain khumbu.eeng.dcu.ie)
Date: Thu 07 Oct 1999 - 16:05:31 IST
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Brendan Kehoe wrote:
> I've been able to build it successfully on a 6.0 system using the same
> versions of the tools as you cited in an earlier message:
> RMS error = 29.7604
> PSNR (transform domain) = 18.658
thanks a lot guys, it's seriously appreciated. If only I knew a little
more about how dynamic linking worked... I must have missed something
along the line.
Can I borrow your machine? ;-)
But seriously, does someone have a copy of RH6/6.1 that I could borrow in
the region of Dublin city centre? I lent my copy to someone who cracked
> Are you building it with the default use of -O6 for its optimization? What
> happens if you build it with no optimization at all? (Mine did build with
> those, but you never know...)
I guess it's worth a try... I seem to recall getting rid of all the
optimisation and warning stuff at one stage just to try something new, and
it didn't make much of a difference.
> What does ldd give you for the encode executable? Mine reports:
> libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 => /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 (0x40019000)
> libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4005b000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40077000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
That's not something I've tried (read knew about :)...will do so later.
> I don't know, but egcs has now taken the role of the FSF's official gcc, thus
> the 2.95.* releases.
I kinda liked gcc...ah well, move with the times, I guess.
Thanks again to everyone who lent an ear and a few fingers to help.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:41 GMT