From: Brendan Kehoe (brendan at domain zen.org)
Date: Thu 07 Oct 1999 - 18:28:10 IST
> >fellow, Ben Kosnik, is helping to lead an effort to do a full implementation
> >of the C++ library as well, to allow GNU C++ to be both feature complete and
> >offer amazing code quality. Who, me, biased? Naw...)
>
> what's wrong with stlport? www.stlport.org. does it not offer the full
> c++ library, is the implementation bad, what?
STLport is only the STL portion as far as I know, which isn't the complete
standard library. Though the STL, for which libstdc++-v3 and STLport both use
as a basis for part of their stuff like containers or iterators, is indeed a
good portion of some of the sections related to the library. (Things that
aren't part of the STL would be like strings, streams, and locales.)
B
-- Brendan Kehoe Web page: http://www.zen.org/~brendan/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:41 GMT