RE: [OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive...

From: Kenn Humborg (kenn at domain bluetree.ie)
Date: Fri 29 Oct 1999 - 11:38:10 IST

• Next message: gary mc closkey: "Re: [OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Previous message: Donncha O Caoimh: "Re: [OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Maybe in reply to: Kenn Humborg: "[OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Next in thread: gary mc closkey: "Re: [OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Reply: gary mc closkey: "Re: [OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Reply: Shane Dempsey: "Re: [OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Oops! Mistake... This is the correct one

factorial:
      .mask ^<r5>
      movl (ap), r0
      bneq work_to_do
      incl r0
      ret
work_to_do:
      movl r0, r5
      decl r0
      pushl r0
      calls #1, factorial
      mul2 r5, r0
      ret

fact_test:
      .mask ^<>
      pushl #30
      calls #1, factorial
      ; result in r0

Later,
Kenn

• Next message: gary mc closkey: "Re: [OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Previous message: Donncha O Caoimh: "Re: [OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Maybe in reply to: Kenn Humborg: "[OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Next in thread: gary mc closkey: "Re: [OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Reply: gary mc closkey: "Re: [OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Reply: Shane Dempsey: "Re: [OT] Factorials RE: [ILUG] impressive..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:48 GMT