RE: [ILUG] impressive...

From: Twomey_Mark at domain emc.com
Date: Fri 29 Oct 1999 - 14:29:11 IST

• Next message: Kenn Humborg: "[OT] CISC vs RISC [was Re: [ILUG] impressive...]"
• Previous message: Kenn Humborg: "Re: [ILUG] Missing GNU tool"
• Maybe in reply to: John P . Looney: "[ILUG] impressive..."
• Next in thread: Kenn Humborg: "[OT] CISC vs RISC [was Re: [ILUG] impressive...]"
• Reply: Kenn Humborg: "[OT] CISC vs RISC [was Re: [ILUG] impressive...]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Kenn Humborg wrote:

>Gotta love CISC, though!

NO I bloody dont!

Mark.

• Next message: Kenn Humborg: "[OT] CISC vs RISC [was Re: [ILUG] impressive...]"
• Previous message: Kenn Humborg: "Re: [ILUG] Missing GNU tool"
• Maybe in reply to: John P . Looney: "[ILUG] impressive..."
• Next in thread: Kenn Humborg: "[OT] CISC vs RISC [was Re: [ILUG] impressive...]"
• Reply: Kenn Humborg: "[OT] CISC vs RISC [was Re: [ILUG] impressive...]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:48 GMT